National Labor Relations Board v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that joint employer situation exists only when “two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment”
• noting that, under Boire, Greyhound's status as a joint employer \is unaffected by any possible determination as to Floors' status as an independent contractor\
• explaining that the issue of whether an employer has “sufficient indicia of control . . . is essentially a factual issue” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that the issue of whether an employer has \sufficient indicia of control ... is essentially a factual issue\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• determining whether to add instructors at various institutions affiliated with Vermont State Colleges to existing Vermont State Colleges faculty bargaining unit
• presenting the share-or- codetermine test as requiring separate “business entities”—not separate common-law “employers”—taking that action to qualify as an employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).