National Labor Relations Board v. Brookwood Furniture, Division of U.S. Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the NLRB can consider the timing of an employer's actions as evidence of a violation
• noting that statements found to be coercive were made \in the context of 'a vigorous * * * antiunion campaign' \
• noting that an employees's evasive answer or refusal to answer a supervisor's questions about union activities \objectively indicates possible fear of retaliation\
• “[W]here, as here, the record is fraught with conflicting testimony, requiring essential credibility determinations to be made, the trier of fact's conclusions must be accorded particular deference.”
• “[W]here, as here, the record is fraught with conflicting testimony, requiring essential credibility determinations to be made, the trier of fact’s conclusions must be accorded particular deference.”
• “a reviewing court may not lightly displace the Board’s factual finding of discriminatory intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).