National Labor Relations Board v. Beverly Enterprises-Massachusetts, Inc., D/B/A Beverly Manor Nursing Home

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that intent is only relevant insofar as it 12 demonstrates an intent to confuse consumers
• finding that “[a]n ALJ can consider all the evidence without directly addressing in his written decision every piece of evidence submitted by a party”
• explaining that 14 Admin. R. at 16. 15 Pl. Mot. to Reverse Mem. (doc. no. 7-2
• noting that “the possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency’s finding from being supported by substantial evidence” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding district court 16 did not err when it classified the plaintiff’s mark as weak at preliminary injunction stage 17 despite the plaintiff’s use of the mark for five years and expenditures of over $100,000 in 18 advertising
• finding failure to bargain to impasse prior to unilateral change constitutes an unfair labor practice under the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).