National Labor Relations Board v. Argo Steel Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the patentee is not “required to demonstrate a one.-to-one correspondence between units sold and directly infringing customers”.
• evaluating the doctrine of successor liability and alter ego status under existing state law in a patent infringement case
• “[I]n cases in which there is a question whether every sale leads to an instance of direct infringement, a patentee must . . . establish the connection between sales and direct infringement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).