National Labor Relations Board v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Teamsters, Chauffeurs, & Helpers Local Union No. 391, Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that questioning of employees about number of union cards signed, placing employees in a position of having to admit or deny union support, and participating in anti-union petition were all unfair labor practices
• noting that the ALJ's credibility findings, when adopted by the Board, generally are accepted by the reviewing court, absent exceptional circumstances
• enforcing a bargaining order, and sustaining the Board's analysis under our Appletree Chevrolet I requirements, in circumstances where the violations were less pervasive and egregious than here and the Board's analysis less detailed
• enforcing a bargaining order, and sustaining the Board’s analysis under our Appletree Chevrolet I requirements, in circumstances where the violations were less pervasive and egregious than here and the Board’s analysis less detailed
• enforcing a bargaining order, and sustaining the Board's anal- ysis under our Appletree Chevrolet I requirements, in circumstances where the violations were less pervasive and egregious than here and the Board's analysis less detailed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).