National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. Ferguson Electric Company, Inc., Respondent/cross-Petitioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the period may be shortened by a showing that the salt accepted a promotion from the Union during the back pay period which removed him from the field
• “Even when the Board itself raises and decides an issue sua sponte, an objection must be filed with the Board to preserve the issue for a reviewing court.”
• ‘‘[m]ere [u]ncertainty . . . does not render a back pay award speculative, since [a] back pay award is only an approximation, necessitated by the employer’s wrong- ful conduct’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).