National Indian Youth Council v. Andrus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “[t]he Supreme Court has clearly held that prosecution of a citizen for ‘nonprovoca-tively voicing his objection’, to police conduct impermissibly punishes constitutionally protected speech”
• “A policy cannot ordinarily be inferred from a single instance of illegality . . . .”
• “A plaintiff must identify the challenged policy, attribute it to the city itself, and show a causal link between execution of the policy and the injury suffered.”
• “A plaintiff must identify the challenged policy, attribute it to the city itself, and show a causal link between execution of the policy and the injury suffered.”
• “A plaintiff must identify the challenged policy, attribute it to the city itself, and show a causal link between execution of the policy and the injury suffered.”
• “[a] policy cannot ordinarily be inferred from a single instance of illegality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).