National Fire Insurance v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendants’ request to exclude finger and palm print evidence under Daubert, despite defendants’ challenge to the “the continuing viability of latent fingerprint evidence in the face of the NAS Committee’s call for more research”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).