National Fire Insurance v. Cannon & Byers Millinery Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, prior to the Legislature amending section 1102.5 in 2014, “only complaints or reports made to a governmental agency [were] protected,” and “complaints or reports made ‘internally’ to the employer [were] not protected”
• noting the use of 1 circumstantial evidence in FEHA claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).