National Fiberstock Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claimant may be entitled to reinstatement of benefits after a termination if the claimant proves that his disability has increased or recurred since the prior decision and that his physical condition has changed in some manner
• upholding post-termination reinstatement where the claimant’s doctor testified unequivocally and with the support of objective evidence that the claimant’s condition had recurred and worsened
• “[A] medical expert who bases his or her opinion on a factual assumption that is inconsistent with a previously decided medical fact may be ruled legally incompetent.”
• \[A] medical expert who bases his or her opinion on a factual assumption that is inconsistent with a previously decided medical fact may be ruled legally incompetent.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).