National Family Insurance Co. v. Boyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no relationship between the use of gun and the use of the parked automobile; the automobile was the mere situs of the injury
• denying coverage since there was no relationship between shooting of gun and use of vehicle for transportation purposes
• supreme court rejected as “pure speculation” insured’s assertion that he “may have” caught the hammer of the gun on the inside of the car roof
• no coverage where after leaving bar, passenger sitting in parked car accidentally discharged gun wounding entering passenger
• in which no coverage was found when, after leaving a bar, passenger sitting in a parked car accidentally discharged gun wounding entering passengers
• no coverage where after leaving bar, passenger sitting in parked car accidentally discharged gun wounding entering passenger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).