Skip to main content
· 7/1/1889

National Exchange Bank v. Holman

Citations

  • 31 S.C. 161
  • 9 S.E. 824
  • 1889 S.C. LEXIS 24

Syllabus

<p>1. In action to recover the balance due on a note secured by a chattel mortgage after seizure and sale of the mortgaged chattels, the defendant pleaded payment by agreement of the plaintiff to accept the mortgaged property in full discharge of the debt; but there was no testimony to support this defence. Held, that the court would not consider the defence raised in argument that the debt was destroyed by a sale in a county other than that in which the property was found. 18 Slat., 124.</p> <p>2. If mortgaged chattels be sold in a county other than that provided for by statute, do the seizure and sale operate to extinguish the debt?</p>

Judges: McGowan, McIver, Simpson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.