National Deposit Guarantee Corp. v. Peck (In Re Peck)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying similar principle of Ohio law and denying relief under § 522(f)(1)
• absent an attachment or other involuntary disposition of the Debtor’s property, the Debtor’s exemption is not impaired
• The plain language of the Ohio exemption statute explicitly mandates that an exemption was impaired only upon a pending “execution, garnishment, attachment or sale to satisfy a judgment.”
• absent attachment or other involuntary disposition, debtor’s homestead property is not impaired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).