Skip to main content
· 4/22/2003

National Council Against Health Fraud, Inc. v. King Bio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Citations

  • 133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 207
  • 107 Cal. App. 4th 1336
  • 3 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3329
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 4239
  • 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that private plaintiffs may seek relief only from false or misleading statements
  • holding claims resting on lack of substantiation, instead of provable falseness, are not actionable in California
  • FTC may rely on theory that advertiser lacked reason‐ able basis for its claims
  • FTC may rely on theory that advertiser lacked reason‐ able basis for its claims
  • “Private plaintiffs are not authorized to demand substantiation for advertising claims.”
  • “Private plaintiffs are not authorized to demand substantiation for advertising claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grignon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.