National Consumers League v. Flowers Bakeries, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims of non-party consumers did not count toward the amount-in-controversy requirement
• holding that private attorney general action, even when brought under statute that authorizes claim “on behalf of the interests of . . . a class of consumers,” is not “similar” to Rule 23 because there are no requirements of adequacy, numerosity, commonality, and typicality
• “so long as individual consumers are eligible to recover individual damages, the consumers do not have a ‘common and undivided interest’ that may be aggregated under the non- aggregation principal announced in Snyder”
• “so long as individual consumers are eligible to recover individual damages, the consumers do not have a ‘common and undivided interest’ that may be aggregated under the non- aggregation principal announced in Snyder”
• “so long as individual consumers are eligible to recover individual damages, the consumers do not have a ‘common and undivided interest’ that may be aggregated under the non- aggregation principal announced in Snyder”
• “so long as individual consumers are eligible to recover individual damages, the consumers do not have a ‘common and undivided interest’ that may be aggregated under the non- aggregation principal announced in Snyder”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).