National Casualty Co. v. First State Insurance Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remarking that the unfairness to a party that could not obtain documents was offset by the “routine remedy” of drawing inferences against the other party
• assuming that arbitrator misconduct as ground for vacatur was not limited to refusal to consider evidence and extended to claim that arbitrator improperly had failed to compel party to produce material evidence
• the term “describes underhanded or conniving ways of procuring an award that are similar to corruption or fraud, but do not precisely constitute either.”
• the term “describes underhanded or conniving ways of procuring an award that are similar to corruption or fraud, but do not precisely constitute either.”
• review of arbitration awards is “extremely narrow and exceedingly deferential”
• review of arbitration awards is “extremely narrow and exceedingly deferential”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).