National By-Products, Inc. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff did not prove a taking because it \failed to establish that the floodings . . . will inevitably recur\
• finding that severe floodings resulting from government operation of a dam constituted a tort since floodings were shown to be isolated occurrences that would not inevitably reoccur
• characterizing the remoteness rule as “a somewhat flabby standard which has taken on meaning only through developing case law.”
• involving a levee built on one side of a creek without a corresponding levee on the other side
• involving a levee built on one side of a creek without a corresponding levee on the other side
• finding no taking because plaintiffs did not prove floods caused by levees would inevitably recur

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).