Skip to main content
· 12/8/1965

National Brotherhood Packinghouse & Dairy Workers, Local No. 52 v. Western Iowa Pork Co.

Citations

  • 247 F. Supp. 663
  • 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2800
  • 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the predominance requirement was not met where the proposed class included individuals who: (1) were unaware of the presence of hexavalent chromium in the weight loss product and who would not have purchased the product had they been so aware; (2
  • “The Seventh Circuit has emphasized that a proposed class representative is inadequate if she is subject to even an arguable defense not applicable to the class as a whole.”
  • “The proposed class includes individuals who: (1) were unaware of the presence of hexavalent chromium in Dexatrim and who would not have purchased the product had they been so aware; (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.