National Biscuit Co. v. Hoey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting First Amendment facial challenge to Kentucky law that “requires that advertisements supporting a particular candidate contain identification of the sponsor” of that advertisement
• Sixth Circuit upholding a matching funds scheme against a constitutional challenge without addressing the Day analysis
• \[T]he central question we are faced with is whether the substantial advantage [afforded to PFCs] rises to the level of unconstitutional coercion.\
• “Absent a clearer form of coercion, we decline to find that the incentives inherent in the Trigger provision are different in kind from clearly constitutional incentives.”
• “[T]he central question we are faced with is whether the substantial advantage [afforded to PFCs] rises to the level of unconstitutional coercion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).