National Bank of Commerce of Seattle, Wash v. Lytle Logg. & Merc. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a judge in equity could not permit an entirely new claim filed out of time
• disallowing late filed claim even though debtor listed the debt in a bankruptcy schedule and the bankruptcy court confirmed the debtor’s reorganization plan, which included the debt at issue
• holding the Rule 3002(c) deadline for filing a proof of claim is \an absolute bar\ to allowing late-filed claims unless one of the Rule 3002(c) exceptions applies, and specifically concluding that a bankruptcy judge is not vested with the equitable power to circumvent Rule 3002(c
• confirmed plan providing that creditor had an allowed claim did not relieve creditor of the need to file a timely proof of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).