Skip to main content
· 2/15/1923

National Automatic Typewriter Co. v. Hoover Automatic Typewriter Co.

Citations

  • 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a rule insufficiently final because, among other things, it “had not been published” and “further administrative proceedings [were] contemplated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.