National Australia Bank v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An erroneous mutual belief about the contents of a written agreement is sufficient to constitute a ‘mistake’ for this purpose ....”
• Termination Agreement “is ambiguous and does not, on its face, support the trial court’s conclusion that the 75/25 split applies to damages accruing to NAB ... award of damages must therefore be reversed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).