National Ass'n of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. v. City of Providence

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that tobacco product 3 sales regulations are not tobacco product standards preempted by the FSPTCA and stating 4 that “whether those regulations have an impact on manufacturing is irrelevant”
• holding that tobacco product 15 sales regulations are not tobacco product standards preempted by the FSPTCA and stating 16 that “whether those regulations have an impact on manufacturing is irrelevant”
• recognizing that the Act allows regulations relat- ing to the sale of tobacco products
• holding prohibition on discounts for tobacco products by coupons and multi-packs regulated economic conduct
• holding that sales regulations were not tobacco product standards
• description on label as presumptive evidence of product classification for the 9 purposes of banning the product’s sale does not implicate speech

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).