National Ass'n of Boards of Pharmacy v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that policy was not unambiguously terminated, in part because its cessation was not announced until a hearing for a preliminary injunction
• explaining that a plaintiff can sue a state official in his official capacity for prospective injunctive relief “to prevent a continuing violation of federal law”
• treating a dispute regarding whether the plaintiff alleged an ongoing violation as a mootness inquiry
• considering the fact that “the Board of Regents made similar promises before ... and failed to keep them, prompting the current law suit”
• finding reasonable basis to conclude infringement might continue where counsel did not provide any reasoned basis for the voluntary cessation
• noting in finding that infringing activities by professor had not been unambiguously terminated that “canceling the August review course did not bar a future course”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).