Skip to main content
· 7/21/2015

National Ass'n for Surface Finishing v. Environmental Protection Agency

Citations

  • 417 App. D.C. 264
  • 795 F.3d 1
  • 417 U.S. App. D.C. 264
  • 80 ERC (BNA) 1937
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • referring to analogous reviews as “distinct, parallel analyses” that EPA undertakes “[s]eparately”
  • ʺIt is axiomatic that an employeeʹs job responsibilities do 13 not include acting in the capacity of a union member, leader, or official.ʺ
  • “If the employer [provides a legitimate, 23 nondiscriminatory reason for the employment action], the burden shifts back to the 24 employee to prove that the employer’s explanation is a pretext for discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffith, Pillard, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.