Skip to main content
· 8/23/2007

National American Insurance v. United States

Citations

  • 498 F.3d 1301
  • 78 Fed. Cl. 1301
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20058
  • 2007 WL 2388896

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remarking that courts are not bound by dicta but that merely because a statement is dicta does not mean that the statement is incorrect
  • noting that the Court of Federal Claims is not bound by statements “unnecessary to the decision in the case”
  • defining dicta as statements that are not necessary for a decision
  • defining dicta as statements that are not necessary for a decision
  • defining dicta as statements that are not necessary for a decision
  • defining dicta as statements that are not necessary for a decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linn, Circuit Judge, Clevenger, Senior Circuit Judge, and Prost, Circuit Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.