National Aluminate Corp. v. Hall Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because of “the strong policy considerations underlying referendums ... absent highly unusual circumstances, the discriminatory effect of a referendum cannot establish a violation of the Fair Housing Act”
• holding that because of “the strong policy considerations underlying referendums . . . absent highly unusual circumstances, the discriminatory effect of a referendum cannot establish a violation of the Fair Housing Act”
• “[AJbsent highly unusual circumstances, the discriminatory effect of a referendum cannot establish a violation of the Fair Housing Act.”
• disparate-impact claim against a governmental defendant under the FHA
• disparate-impact claim against a governmental defendant under the FHA
• disparate-impact claim against a governmental defendant under the FHA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).