National Advertising Co. v. STATE, DOT

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that billboard replacement cost was insufficient compensation where a billboard's location was unique and it could not be relocated; the condemnor should have presented evidence of income in valuing the leasehold interest
• concluding that billboard replacement cost was insufficient compensation where a billboard’s location was unique and it could not be relocated; the condemnor should have presented evidence of income in valuing the leasehold interest
• error in excluding evidence of rental income, relevant to value of leasehold interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).