Skip to main content
· 10/13/1913

Nathenson v. Crossland

Citations

  • 54 Pa. Super. 610
  • 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 113

Syllabus

<p>Sale — Change of possession — Delivery—Fraud.</p> <p>Where an owner of a horse and harness purchases them for a sufficient sum, and takes them into his possession for a few days, and thereafter enters into an arrangement with the vendor by which the latter engages in a huckstering business on their joint account, one supplying the horse and the provisions to be sold and the other supplying the wagon, and after this had continued for two months, the purchaser resumes possession of the horse, and after a week it is levied upon by an execution creditor of the vendor, the question whether there had been a sufficient delivery of the horse so as to transfer a valid title to it, is a question for the jury.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.