Skip to main content
· 9/11/2006

Nathaniel S. Shapo v. Clyde Wm. Engle v. Foley & Lardner, LLP

Citations

  • 463 F.3d 641
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23139
  • 2006 WL 2588919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no supplemental jurisdiction to enforce attorney-client master fee agreement after district court approved settlement and dismissed case
  • describ- ing test for finality as whether the judge has finished with the case
  • “[A] district court does not have jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement merely because the agreement was the premise of the court’s dismissal of the [federal] suit that the agreement settled.”
  • while criticizing the No. 08‐2801 Page 3 practice of dismissing suits before settlements are implemented, acknowledging that courts can retain jurisdiction to enforce settlements in cases that are dismissed without prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Coffey, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.