· 9/11/2006
Nathaniel S. Shapo v. Clyde Wm. Engle v. Foley & Lardner, LLP
Citations
- 463 F.3d 641
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23139
- 2006 WL 2588919
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no supplemental jurisdiction to enforce attorney-client master fee agreement after district court approved settlement and dismissed case
- describ- ing test for finality as whether the judge has finished with the case
- “[A] district court does not have jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement merely because the agreement was the premise of the court’s dismissal of the [federal] suit that the agreement settled.”
- while criticizing the No. 08‐2801 Page 3 practice of dismissing suits before settlements are implemented, acknowledging that courts can retain jurisdiction to enforce settlements in cases that are dismissed without prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Coffey, Ripple
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.