Nathaniel Russell v. Michael Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the federal judge should have recused himself in the habeas proceeding because he served on the state appellate court that affirmed petitioner’s conviction
• \nothing in the language or history of [ 455(a)] suggests that the statute affects the validity of orders the judge made before he recused himself\
• remanding without addressing merits to allow pro se litigant to file Rule 60(b) motion challenging orders entered by judge who had recused himself
• remanding without addressing merits to allow pro se litigant to file Rule 60(b) motion challenging orders entered by judge who had recused himself
• examining the relevant federal statute and observing that a judge's recusal does not render the orders entered before recusal necessarily infirm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).