Skip to main content
· 1/31/1989

Nathaniel Robinson v. The City of Omaha, Nebraska

Citations

  • 866 F.2d 1042
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 702
  • 1989 WL 5893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that abstention doctrines in general may be raised sua sponte
  • discussing the duty of federal courts to avoid deciding issues of state law where no state court has interpreted the provision at issue
  • ordering Pullman abstention where state law claim could establish applicability of local ordinance at issue and whether it conflicted with state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Gibson, Nichol

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.