· 1/31/1989
Nathaniel Robinson v. The City of Omaha, Nebraska
Citations
- 866 F.2d 1042
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 702
- 1989 WL 5893
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that abstention doctrines in general may be raised sua sponte
- discussing the duty of federal courts to avoid deciding issues of state law where no state court has interpreted the provision at issue
- ordering Pullman abstention where state law claim could establish applicability of local ordinance at issue and whether it conflicted with state law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lay, Gibson, Nichol
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.