Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a general policy promulgated by the defendant constituted the same series of transactions or occurrences
• holding that the defendant’s conduct was basic to each plaintiff's recovery and therefore the plaintiffs were properly joined
• concluding that a “company-wide policy purportedly designed to discriminate against blacks in employment . . . arises out of the same series of transactions or occurrences.”
• finding that whether the threat of a racially discriminatory policy hangs over a racial class is a question of fact common to all the members of the class
• holding, based on analogy to Rule 13(a), that Rule 20(a)'s \transaction or occurrence\ standard permits \all reasonably related claims\ to be tried together
• stating that “all reasonably related claims for relief by or against different parties [can] be tried in a single proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).