· 5/12/1994
Nathaniel James v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Attorney General of California
Citations
- 24 F.3d 20
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 6362
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3340
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10484
- 1994 WL 178404
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Conclusory allegations of [IAC] which are not 23 supported by a statement of specific facts do not warrant habeas relief.”
- “Conclusory allegations which are not supported 25 by a statement of specific facts do not warrant habeas relief.”
- “Conclusory 10 allegations which are not supported by a statement of specific facts do not warrant habeas 11 relief.”
- “Conclusory allegations which are not supported by a statement of 13 specific facts do not warrant habeas relief.”
- “Conclusory allegations which are not supported by a statement of specific 9 facts do not warrant habeas relief.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hug, Wiggins, Noonan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.