Skip to main content
· 10/15/1907

Nathan v. Halsell

Citations

  • 91 Miss. 785
  • 45 So. 856

Syllabus

<p>1. Attorney and Client. Fees. Contracts.</p> <p>Where an attorney fixed the fee he would charge for collecting money, he cannot afterwards predicate a greater charge of the fact that more labor was required to effect the collection than he had anticipated.</p> <p>2. Same. Compromise by attorney. Liability to client.</p> <p>The proceeds of an unauthorized compromise of his client’s debt cannot be returned by an attorney to the debtor because the client objected only to the quantum of his fee.</p>

Judges: Calhoon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.