Nathan Sinko v. State of Mississippi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding service courts have discretion in deciding whether to order a rehearing or dismiss charges when a rehearing is not ordered
• after seeking reconsideration en banc with this court, the Government then certified the issue of whether this court erred in dismissing specifications without authorizing the convening authority to order a rehearing
• explain- ing with regard to the discretionary authority of the CCAs under Article 66(d) that, “[t]he statute says … a CCA may order a rehearing; it does not say that it must. ‘May’ is a permissive term, see United States v. Moss, 73 M.J. 64, 68 (C.A.A.F. 2014
• “An individual cannot consent to aggravated assault.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).