Nathan Lewis v. Robert C. Jenkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “a form containing a sin- gle line for best-interests findings is not well suited to mak- ing thoughtful written findings”
• observing that “a form containing a sin- gle line for best-interests findings is not well suited to mak- ing thoughtful written findings”
• “Findings that are ambiguous as to whether they are directed to the youth’s best interests * * * will not survive appellate review and will result in remand for additional findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).