Skip to main content
· 11/14/2006

Nathan Gillis v. Jon E. Litscher, Gerald A. Berge, Warden, Bradley Hompe

Citations

  • 468 F.3d 488
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 28126
  • 2006 WL 3290237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the combined effects of unsanitary conditions can violate the Constitution
  • holding that the temporary conditions of a state prisoner's segregated cell, which lacked a bed, normal meals, and other amenities (but which included a toilet and did not involve ambulatory restraints), was an objectively serious condition under the Eighth Amendment
  • explaining that prisons No. 08‐2567 Page 4 must provide “reasonably adequate ventilation, sanitation, bedding, hygienic materials, and utilities” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • explaining that prisons must provide “reasonably adequate ventilation, sanitation, bedding, hygienic materials, and utilities” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • ruling qualified immunity inappropriate on Wisconsin supermax inmate/plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim where conditions of his confinement included: “denial of shelter, heat, and hygiene items implicated an inmate’s constitutional rights”
  • noting that evaluation of conditions of confinement claims is a fact-intensive inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Ripple, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.