Nathalia L. Brown v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Potomac Electrical Power Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that most courts hold that claimants can receive both “schedule” and “non-schedule” permanent-partial benefits, with benefits being paid consecutively and applicable time limits being “laid end-to-end”
• remanding case so that CRB could resolve matter in first instance, “engage in the necessary analysis,” and provide “clearer exposition” of its reasoning
• remanding case so that CRB could resolve matter in first instance, “engage in the necessary analysis,” and provide “clearer exposition” of its reasoning
• addressing issues arising from award of both “non-schedule” and “schedule” permanent partial benefits
• “our review is subject to well-established doctrines mandating deference to an administrative agency’s interpretation of its own rules and regulations”
• “[A]n administrative tribunal has wide latitude in adopting rules of procedure for the proceedings before it. This authority extends to rules of issue preservation and forfeiture . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).