Naterra International, Inc. v. Bensalem

Oral argument

• Argued

  26 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statute was money mandating because it required the government to enter into a contract to pay money to any recipient who met the requirements of the statute and had no discretion to refuse to enter into such contracts
• “The import of this language is only to allow the Secretary to alter the quantities in a contract, but not to permit him to refuse to enter into a contract altogether with a qualified applicant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).