Natasha Belishta Franc Belishta Desara Belishta v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that humanitarian asylum requires a showing 2 of past persecution
• holding that 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(l)(iii)(B
• remanding for consideration of humanitarian grant where fear of future MOHAMMED v. GONZALES 3089 harm was not related to a protected ground
• “[I]in order to be eligible for [humanitarian] asylum . . . , an applicant must still establish past persecution on account of a protected ground.”
• in order to be eligible for humanitarian asylum, “an applicant must still establish past persecution on account of a protected ground”
• not- ing that the humanitarian asylum exception “provides for discretionary grants of asylum to victims of past persecution who no longer reasonably fear future persecution on account of a protected ground”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).