Skip to main content
· 7/17/2013

Natalie Medley v. Bruce Lemmon, Julie Stout, Pam Ferguson, Stacey Milner, Sherry White, L.A. Vannatta, Mike Pavese, Virginia McCullough

Citations

  • 994 N.E.2d 1177
  • 2013 WL 3742772
  • 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is not clear whether a “retaliation claim should automatically be defeated in such a situation, especially where the decision of what punishment to impose on a prisoner for a rules infraction is entirely discretionary.”
  • request for injunctive relief regarding visitation restrictions became moot when those restrictions 1 See Ind. Bd. of Pharm. v. Elmer, 171 N.E.3d 1045, 1052 (Ind. Ct. App. 2021
  • no private right of action under Ind. Code § 11-11-3-9, concerning restrictions on visitation
  • request for injunctive relief regarding visitation restrictions became moot when those restrictions expired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Najam, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.