· 10/5/2015
Natal v. Williams
Citations
- 136 S. Ct. 95
- 193 L. Ed. 2d 80
- 84 U.S.L.W. 3168
- 2015 U.S. LEXIS 5217
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a party proceeding in forma pauperis is not exempt from payment of such fees where applicable
- holding that allegations of indifference on the part of prison medical staff, with no indication of the specific deficiencies in care, were insufficient to sustain an Eighth Amendment claim
- discussing that, ordinarily, transfers to the general population of another prison are not typically an adverse action
- “there is no constitutional or statutory requirement that the government or Defendant pay for an indigent prisoner’s [litigation] efforts”
- “there is no constitutional or statutory requirement that the government or Defendant pay for an indigent prisoner’s [litigation] efforts”
- “there is no constitutional or statutory requirement that the government or Defendant pay for an indigent prisoner’s [litigation] efforts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.