Skip to main content
· 10/5/2015

Natal v. Williams

Citations

  • 136 S. Ct. 95
  • 193 L. Ed. 2d 80
  • 84 U.S.L.W. 3168
  • 2015 U.S. LEXIS 5217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party proceeding in forma pauperis is not exempt from payment of such fees where applicable
  • holding that allegations of indifference on the part of prison medical staff, with no indication of the specific deficiencies in care, were insufficient to sustain an Eighth Amendment claim
  • discussing that, ordinarily, transfers to the general population of another prison are not typically an adverse action
  • “there is no constitutional or statutory requirement that the government or Defendant pay for an indigent prisoner’s [litigation] efforts”
  • “there is no constitutional or statutory requirement that the government or Defendant pay for an indigent prisoner’s [litigation] efforts”
  • “there is no constitutional or statutory requirement that the government or Defendant pay for an indigent prisoner’s [litigation] efforts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.