Natacha Peuguero and Angelo Peuguero v. Bank of America, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for new damages hearing where properly admitted evidence did not support total amount awarded in foreclosure judgment
• remanding for new damages hearing where properly admitted evidence did not support total amount awarded in foreclosure judgment
• “A plaintiff need not prove the exact date of a necessary [indorsement to show standing at the inception of the foreclosure action—testimony, that the [i]ndorsement was effectuated before the filing of the complaint will suffice.”
• where loan payment history was submitted into evidence which reflected the amount of principal owed on the loan but not the amount of interest accrued, the proper remedy was to remand for further proceedings to properly establish the damages owed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).