Nastri v. Wood Bros. Homes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding second purchaser s failure to show damage to more than the structure itself prohibited a claim of negligence against die builder
• holding that the Arizona decisions establish one implied warranty
• holding cracks in kitchen floor, vinyl flooring, family room and bedroom, and buckling of the roof, cracked bricks and joists, all involved damage to the structure itself; therefore, only economic losses were presented and owners could not sue in tort
• applying the economic loss doctrine to a negligent construction action against builder
• upholding dismissal of plaintiffs’ negligence claim for purely economic losses resulting from latent construction defects in their home, while reversing dismissal of claim for breach of implied warranty of workmanship
• “‘Property interests . . . have generally been found to merit protection from physical harm.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).