Nastasi v. St. Joe Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indictment for burglary held not defective because it failed to recite “with intent to commit a crime”
• indictment for burglary held not defective because it failed to recite \with intent to commit a crime\
• ”[T]here was ample time [for the defendant] to invoke the provisions of the Uniform Act to secure the attendance of witnesses who were absent from this jurisdiction.”
• \[T]here was ample time [for the defendant] to invoke the provisions of the Uniform Act to secure the attendance of witnesses who were absent from this jurisdiction.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).