Skip to main content
· 9/19/2014

Nasser Beydoun v. Wataniya Restaurants Holding

Citations

  • 768 F.3d 499
  • 2014 FED App. 0243P
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17962
  • 2014 WL 4654565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the agent of the defendant travelling to the forum state to recruit the plaintiff satisfied the \slightest transaction\ test
  • finding that the agent of the defendant travelling to the forum state to recruit the plaintiff satisfied the “slightest transaction” test
  • single recruiting visit sufficient, and subsequent trips relevant, to show defendant transacted business in forum state
  • noting “[i]n general, it is improper for a court to consider hearsay statements when ruling on a motion to dismiss”
  • declining to decide purposeful availment question where plaintiffs “failed to satisfy the other two prongs” of the Southern Machine test
  • finding the agent of the defendant travelling to the forum state to recruit the plaintiff satisfied the “slightest transaction” test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Griffin, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.