Nassar v. County of Cook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[p]laintiffs cannot object where they first elicited the testimony during their examination of [the witness]\
• stating that “[p]laintiffs cannot object where they first elicited the testimony during their examination of [the witness]”
• stating that factual statements are not subject to Rule 213
• finding no prejudice where allegedly inadmissible testimony elicited during adverse examination of defendant doctor was cumulative of previously introduced testimony
• finding no prejudice where allegedly inadmissible testimony elicited during adverse examination of defendant doctor was cumulative of previously introduced testimony
• remarks made by counsel in opening statements to the jury are improper if the statements are not made in good faith and are prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).