Nason v. Grant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning courts “must be circumspect about adding words to a statute.”
• “Just as we may not overlook or ignore any of the words in a statute, we must be circumspect about adding words to a statute that the General Assembly did not place there.” (internal citations omitted)
• Courts “must be circumspect about adding words to a statute.”
• discussing presentation of evidence of “malingering”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).