Nasim v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence that prior fire and charged fire were started by same distinctive means – an iron left on an ironing board – was sufficient “to earmark it as the handiwork of the accused” (cleaned up)
• “[G]enerally, evidence tending to show malice or motive is admissible in arson cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).